4.3 Article

Al and Fe levels in mixed saliva of children related to elution behavior from teeth and restorations

Journal

JOURNAL OF TRACE ELEMENTS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 143-148

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2011.05.003

Keywords

Aluminum; Iron; Saliva; Children; Caries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The levels of trace elements in mixed saliva were not well-defined. This study was performed to determine Al and Fe concentrations in mixed saliva of children and to investigate the relationship between these levels and dental caries. Methods: Among 562 collected mixed saliva specimens, 514 and 548 samples for analyses of Al and Fe levels were obtained, respectively. The Al and Fe concentrations were determined using flameless atomic absorption spectrometry. Results: The Al and Fe concentrations in children without a history of caries were 0.093 +/- 0.136 and 0.121 +/- 0.128 mu g/mL, respectively. The Fe level depended on sex. The Fe level in girls who experienced caries was significantly higher than that without caries history. The Al and Fe levels were significantly higher in children with treated caries than children without caries history. The Fe concentrations were affected by restoration type. Composite resin increased the Fe level significantly especially in girls, and the Fe level was also higher in boys treated with both composite resin and metal restorations. In children without caries history, the Al level was inversely proportional to the number of deciduous teeth and increased with the number of permanent teeth. In contrast, the Fe level showed the reverse tendency. Conclusions: The Fe level in mixed saliva of children was influenced by the restoration type. It was suggested that Al was eluted more from sound permanent teeth than sound deciduous teeth, while Fe was eluted in the opposite manner. (C) 2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available