4.5 Article

Fine-tuning scaffolds for tissue regeneration: effects of formic acid processing on tissue reaction to silk fibroin

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/term.257

Keywords

vascularization; biocompatibility; immune response; tissue engineering; degradation; silk fibroin

Funding

  1. European Commission [500283-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Formic acid (FA) plays a key role in the preparation of silk fibroin (SF) scaffolds from cocoons of Bombyx mori and is used for fibre distribution. In this study, we used a subcutaneous implantation model in Wistar rats to examine SF scaffolds prepared by treating the degummed cocoon with FA for either 30 or 60 min. The tissue reaction and inflammatory response to SF was assessed by qualitative histology at intervals from 3 to 180 days. Additionally, dynamic biomaterial-induced vascularization and biomaterial degradation were quantified using a technique for analysing an image of the entire implanted biomaterial. Varying the FA treatment time led to different scaffold morphologies and resulted in two distinct pen-implant tissue reactions. The 30 min-treated scaffold was integrated into the surrounding tissue beginning at day 3 after implantation and vascularization increased 10-fold from 15 to 180 days, while the scaffold was continuously degraded throughout the first 90 days. In contrast, the 60 min-treated SF scaffold appeared as bulk for the first 90 days after implantation, after which a rapid degradation and vascularization process began. After 180 days, the tissue response was similar for both scaffolds, with eventual formation of a well vascularized connective tissue integrating the SF fibres. This study indicates that by modifying the FA treatment time, the tissue reaction to SF scaffolds can be tailored for different tissue-engineering applications. The tunability and biocompatibility of SF make it an attractive scaffold for exploration in regenerative medicine and clinical tissue engineering. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available