Effectiveness and safety of novel oral anticoagulants as compared with vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Effectiveness and safety of novel oral anticoagulants as compared with vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 320-328
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2013-12-13
DOI
10.1111/jth.12485
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Systematic Review: Case-Fatality Rates of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism and Major Bleeding Events Among Patients Treated for Venous Thromboembolism
- (2013) Marc Carrier ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Management and Outcomes of Major Bleeding During Treatment With Dabigatran or Warfarin
- (2013) Ammar Majeed et al. CIRCULATION
- Impact of double-blind vs. open study design on the observed treatment effects of new oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis
- (2013) J.-C. Lega et al. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
- Diagnostic management of acute deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism
- (2013) M. V. Huisman et al. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
- Edoxaban versus Warfarin for the Treatment of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism
- (2013) NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Extended Use of Dabigatran, Warfarin, or Placebo in Venous Thromboembolism
- (2013) Sam Schulman et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Oral Apixaban for the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism
- (2013) Giancarlo Agnelli et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Do open label blinded outcome studies of novel anticoagulants versus warfarin have equivalent validity to those carried out under double-blind conditions?
- (2013) William O’Neil et al. THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
- Efficacy and safety outcomes of oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs in the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis
- (2013) L. A. Castellucci et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Periprocedural Management and Approach to Bleeding in Patients Taking Dabigatran
- (2012) Jeffrey I. Weitz et al. CIRCULATION
- Dabigatran attenuates thrombin generation to a lesser extent than warfarin: could this explain their differential effects on intracranial hemorrhage and myocardial infarction?
- (2012) Brian Dale et al. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS
- Oral Rivaroxaban for the Treatment of Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism
- (2012) NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism: direct and adjusted indirect meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- (2012) B. D. Fox et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Reversal of Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran by Prothrombin Complex Concentrate
- (2011) Elise S. Eerenberg et al. CIRCULATION
- Oral Rivaroxaban for Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism
- (2010) NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- New oral anticoagulant drugs in cardiovascular disease
- (2010) Gregory Lip et al. THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
- Rivaroxaban - an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor - lessons from a broad clinical study programme
- (2009) Sylvia Haas EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
- Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism
- (2009) Sam Schulman et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Efficacy and safety of the oral direct factorXa inhibitor apixaban for symptomatic deep vein thrombosis. The Botticelli DVT dose-ranging study
- (2008) et al. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started