- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Diagnostic and prognostic prediction models
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages 129-141
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2013-07-01
DOI
10.1111/jth.12262
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Advances in Measuring the Effect of Individual Predictors of Cardiovascular Risk: The Role of Reclassification Measures
- (2013) Nancy R. Cook et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Clinical Decision Rules for Excluding Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-analysis
- (2013) Wim Lucassen et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Prediction models for clustered data: comparison of a random intercept and standard regression model
- (2013) Walter Bouwmeester et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Long-term health benefits and costs of measurement of carotid intima–media thickness in prevention of coronary heart disease
- (2013) Hester M. den Ruijter et al. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
- Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 4: Stratified medicine research
- (2013) A. D. Hingorani et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 1: A framework for researching clinical outcomes
- (2013) H. Hemingway et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: Prognostic Factor Research
- (2013) Richard D. Riley et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: Prognostic Model Research
- (2013) Ewout W. Steyerberg et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Risk Prediction Measures for Case-Cohort and Nested Case-Control Designs: An Application to Cardiovascular Disease
- (2012) Andrea Ganna et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Quantifying the Added Value of a Diagnostic Test or Marker
- (2012) K. G. M. Moons et al. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
- Risk prediction models: II. External validation, model updating, and impact assessment
- (2012) Karel G M Moons et al. HEART
- Risk prediction models: I. Development, internal validation, and assessing the incremental value of a new (bio)marker
- (2012) Karel G M Moons et al. HEART
- Predicting disease recurrence in patients with previous unprovoked venous thromboembolism: a proposed prediction score (DASH)
- (2012) A. TOSETTO et al. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
- Safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism using the Wells rule and qualitative D-dimer testing in primary care: prospective cohort study
- (2012) G.-J. Geersing et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Reporting and Methods in Clinical Prediction Research: A Systematic Review
- (2012) Walter Bouwmeester et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Developing risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of methodology and reporting
- (2011) Gary S Collins et al. BMC Medicine
- Prediction models for the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review
- (2011) S van Dieren et al. HEART
- Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for patients with acute pulmonary embolism: an international, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial
- (2011) Drahomir Aujesky et al. LANCET
- Reporting performance of prognostic models in cancer: a review
- (2010) Susan Mallett et al. BMC Medicine
- Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a review
- (2010) Susan Mallett et al. BMC Medicine
- Risk Assessment of Recurrence in Patients With Unprovoked Deep Vein Thrombosis or Pulmonary Embolism
- (2010) Sabine Eichinger et al. CIRCULATION
- Criteria for Scientific Evaluation of Novel Markers: A Perspective
- (2010) K. G.M. Moons CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
- Statistical methods for assessment of added usefulness of new biomarkers
- (2010) Michael J. Pencina et al. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE
- Missing covariate data in medical research: To impute is better than to ignore
- (2010) Kristel J.M. Janssen et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism after stopping treatment in cohort studies: recommendation for acceptable rates and standardized reporting
- (2010) C. KEARON et al. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
- A simple method to adjust clinical prediction models to local circumstances
- (2009) Kristel J. M. Janssen et al. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal canadien d anesthesie
- Dealing with Missing Predictor Values When Applying Clinical Prediction Models
- (2009) K. J.M. Janssen et al. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
- Assessment of Claims of Improved Prediction Beyond the Framingham Risk Score
- (2009) Ioanna Tzoulaki JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Decision analysis to complete diagnostic research by closing the gap between test characteristics and cost-effectiveness
- (2009) Joanna D. Schaafsma et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Development and validation of a prediction model with missing predictor data: a practical approach
- (2009) Yvonne Vergouwe et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Cost-effectiveness of ruling out deep venous thrombosis in primary care versus care as usual
- (2009) A. J. TEN CATE-HOEK et al. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
- Advantages of the nested case-control design in diagnostic research
- (2008) Cornelis J Biesheuvel et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Identifying unprovoked thromboembolism patients at low risk for recurrence who can discontinue anticoagulant therapy
- (2008) M. A. Rodger et al. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
- Validation, updating and impact of clinical prediction rules: A review
- (2008) D.B. Toll et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Multiple imputation to correct for partial verification bias revisited
- (2008) J. A. H. de Groot et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- How should variable selection be performed with multiply imputed data?
- (2008) Angela M. Wood et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Updating methods improved the performance of a clinical prediction model in new patients
- (2007) K.J.M. Janssen et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started