4.6 Article

Challenges and artifacts of probing high-pressure counterflow laminar diffusion flames

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
Volume 35, Issue -, Pages 1871-1878

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2014.05.028

Keywords

Counterflow diffusion flames; Soot; Aromatics; High pressure

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (USA) [CBET-0651906, CBET-1233318]
  2. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1233318] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An experimental study was conducted on two C2H4/O-2/N-2 laminar diffusion flames with identical compositions and strain rate, but operated at 0.29 MPa and 2.5 MPa, respectively, to assess pressure effects on the onset of soot formation. The low-pressure flame was permanently blue, whereas the high-pressure one was under conditions of incipient sooting. Both flames had nominally identical temperature-time history. Using gas sampling through quartz microprobes followed by GC/MS analysis and addressing potential artifacts associated with the diagnostic intrusiveness and probe-induced chemistry, we demonstrated that the flame structure was resolved even at the highest pressures, as shown by the good agreement with respect to major species between the experimental results and a one-dimensional computational model of the flame with detailed chemistry and transport. The increase in soot propensity correlates with an increase in the concentration of soot precursors like the aromatics and acetylene. Comparison with model predictions shows that the concentration of aromatics is systematically overpredicted. An ancillary computational study to estimate the sensitivity to changes in the velocity boundary conditions showed that minor species like the aromatics are sensitive to these details under certain conditions, because of changes in the temperature- time history that affects predominantly the slow chemistry. (C) 2014 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available