4.5 Article

Analysis and prediction of the noise reduction coefficient of lightly-needled Estabragh/polypropylene nonwovens using simplex lattice design

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE TEXTILE INSTITUTE
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages 256-263

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2013.835903

Keywords

NRC; Estabragh; needling; polypropylene; nonwoven; simplex lattice design

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work aims to predict the noise reduction coefficient (NRC) of nonwoven layers produced from Estabragh/polypropylene blends of fibers. Estabragh is a natural hollow fiber which can be expected to have excellent sound insulation properties. In addition to the investigation of Estabragh's unique properties in association with the sound absorption capability, the effects of some predictor variables such as blend ratio, punch density, and areal density (g/m(2)) on the acoustical performance of the produced nonwoven samples also have been studied through this research. For this achievement, a simplex lattice design was used in which the mixture-process crossed regression models with two mixture components and two process variables (punch density and areal density) were built to predict the NRC values of samples. Statistical analysis steps were implemented using Design-Expert statistical software. The correlation coefficient between the predicted and measured values of NRC was found to be 0.98, which confirmed the validity of the developed regression model. It was found that the noise absorption behavior of samples increases as the proportion of Estabragh fibers in the blend increases. Additionally, results showed that samples subjected to more severe needling operation exhibit higher values of NRC. It was also observed that the areal density of samples directly affects their acoustical performance. The higher areal density leads to more sound absorption ability of samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available