4.7 Article

Characteristics of starch from different bean genotypes and its effect on biodegradable films

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 99, Issue 3, Pages 1207-1214

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9292

Keywords

common bean genotypes; bean starch; biodegradable films; film flexibility; starch granule

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Funding Source: Medline
  2. Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Starches from four common bean genotypes were characterized and used in the production of biodegradable films. Starches were characterized by their swelling power, solubility, amylose content, granule morphology, relative crystallinity, thermal and pasting properties, and susceptibility to alpha-amylase hydrolysis. Films were characterized according to their morphology, mechanical and water vapor barrier properties, whiteness and opacity. RESULT Depending on the common bean genotype, a great variation on starch properties was found, which, in turn, clearly impacted on the characteristics of the starch-based films. Starches from BRS Pitanga and BRS Perola genotypes exhibited the highest amylose content and the lowest swelling capabilities. Bean starch from the IPR Uirapuru genotype presented granules with an irregular surface and shape. Starches from IPR Uirapuru and BRS Estilo genotypes provided well-structured biodegradable films, without the occurrence of fissures or cracks. Moreover, starch films containing starch from BRS Estilo genotype exhibited the highest flexibility, permeability and solubility. CONCLUSION The morphological, mechanical and water vapor barrier properties of films elaborated with common bean starch vary greatly as a function of the bean genotype used for starch production. (c) 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available