4.7 Article

Smoking and cardiac rehabilitation participation: Associations with referral, attendance and adherence

Journal

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 80, Issue -, Pages 67-74

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.009

Keywords

Cardiac rehabilitation; Smoking; Smoking cessation; Referral; Attendance; Enrollment; Participation; Adherence; Dropout

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health Center of Biomedical Research Excellence from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P20GM103644]
  2. Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science from the National Institute on Drug Abuse [P50DA036114]
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Continued smoking after a cardiac event greatly increases mortality risk. Smoking cessation and participation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) are effective in reducing morbidity and mortality. However, these two behaviors may interact; those who smoke may be less likely to access or complete CR. This review explores the association between smoking status and CR referral, attendance, and adherence. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted examining associations between smoking status and CR referral, attendance and completion in peer-reviewed studies published through July 1st, 2014. For inclusion, studies had to report data on outpatient CR referral, attendance or completion rates and smoking status had to be considered as a variable associated with these outcomes. Results: Fifty-six studies met inclusion criteria. In summary, a history of smoking was associated with an increased likelihood of referral to CR. However, smoking status also predicted not attending CR and was a strong predictor of CR dropout. Conclusion: Continued smoking after a cardiac event predicts lack of attendance in, and completion of CR. The issue of smoking following a coronary event deserves renewed attention. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available