4.7 Article

Influence of acid hydrolysis on thermal and rheological properties of amaranth starches varying in amylose content

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 92, Issue 8, Pages 1800-1807

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.5549

Keywords

acid modification; rheology; gelatinisation; elastic modulus; pasting

Funding

  1. University of Hong Kong Committee on Research and Conference
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31101225]
  3. Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province [2010R50033]
  4. Department of Education of Zhejiang Province [Y201120360]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: The granules of amaranth starch are very small compared with starches from other sources. In the current work, amaranth starches with different amylose contents were treated with hydrochloric acid as a function of time in order to study the effect of acid treatments on starches. Differential scanning calorimetry and dynamic oscillation in shear were employed to analyse the thermal and rheological properties of acid-modified amaranth starch. RESULTS: Results showed that gelatinisation temperatures and enthalpy change of gelatinisation (Delta H) decreased steeply initially, and had a slight increase with further treatment up to 12 h then decreased, an outcome that reflected distinct resistance to acid with various amylose contents. Rheological parameters of storage and loss moduli during heating, cooling and frequency sweep of modified starches reflected the differential scanning calorimetry results by decreasing in value as the time of acid hydrolysis increased. CONCLUSION: With amylose content increase, the effects of acid hydrolysis on gelatinisation temperatures became less pronounced. Nevertheless, prolonged acid hydrolysis decreased the storage and loss moduli, with the starch pastes becoming more liquid-like. (C) 2012 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available