4.7 Article

Quality assessment of tomato landraces and virus-resistant breeding lines: quick estimation by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 92, Issue 6, Pages 1178-1185

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4661

Keywords

tomato quality; traditional cultivars; organoleptic quality; NIRS

Funding

  1. Spanish MICINN [CICYT CTM2006-01363/TECNO, AGL2008-03822/AGR]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Several tomato landraces are very popular in south-eastern Spain for their organoleptic fruit quality, but these cultivars are highly susceptible to several viruses. A breeding programme is being carried out for the introduction of virus resistances into these landraces. In the last steps of our breeding programme a high number of breeding lines must be evaluated for agronomic and organoleptic quality parameters. Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) technology shows considerable promise and is ideally suited to the requirements of breeders. RESULTS: Significant differences between a set of 35 tomato breeding lines, seven landraces and one commercial hybrid were observed for quality and mineral contentparameters, suggesting that there are considerable levels of geneticdiversity between the cultivar groups studied. Using NIRS on dry samples of tomato constitutes a feasible technique to estimate the content of several minerals ( C, N, P, K, Ca, Na, Mn, Mg and Cu) according to the coefficient of determination for calibration (R-2 > 0.90). NIRS estimations of soluble solids content and titratable acidity obtained were considered useful only for general screening purposes. CONCLUSIONS: NIRS technologymaybe a useful tool in the selection of lines coming out of tomato breeding programs, allowing a quick estimation of mineral content. However, the estimation of soluble solids content and titratable acidity by NIRS must be improved. (C) 2011 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available