4.6 Article

Dynamics of Salmonella infection of macrophages at the single cell level

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE
Volume 9, Issue 75, Pages 2696-2707

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0163

Keywords

Salmonella; macrophage; dynamic; infection rate; Holling's type II

Funding

  1. BBSRC Research Development Fellowship
  2. Cambridge Infectious Diseases Consortium (Defra) [VT0105]
  3. Royal Society
  4. Alborada Trust
  5. RAPIDD programme of the Science & Technology Directorate, Department of Homeland Security
  6. Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health
  7. BBSRC [BB/H021930/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H021930/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Salmonella enterica causes a range of diseases. Salmonellae are intracellular parasites of macrophages, and the control of bacteria within these cells is critical to surviving an infection. The dynamics of the bacteria invading, surviving, proliferating in and killing macrophages are central to disease pathogenesis. Fundamentally important parameters, however, such as the cellular infection rate, have not previously been calculated. We used two independent approaches to calculate the macrophage infection rate: mathematical modelling of Salmonella infection experiments, and analysis of real-time video microscopy of infection events. Cells repeatedly encounter salmonellae, with the bacteria often remain associated with the macrophage for more than ten seconds. Once Salmonella encounters a macrophage, the probability of that bacterium infecting the cell is remarkably low: less than 5%. The macrophage population is heterogeneous in terms of its susceptibility to the first infection event. Once infected, a macrophage can undergo further infection events, but these reinfection events occur at a lower rate than that of the primary infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available