4.1 Article

A meta-analysis of the association between angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion gene polymorphism and steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1470320311422579

Keywords

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE); insertion; deletion (I; D) gene polymorphism; meta-analysis; steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and objective: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) insertion/ deletion (I/ D) gene polymorphism correlates with circulating and cellular ACE concentration. Association between ACE I/ D gene polymorphism and steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) risk in children is still controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the relation between ACE I/ D gene polymorphism and SSNS susceptibility in children. Methods: The relevant investigations were screened from the search engines of PubMed, Cochrane Library and CBM-disc (China Biological Medicine Database) as of 1 March 2011, and eligible studies were synthesized using meta-analysis methods. Results: Ten studies were identified for the analysis of association between ACE I/D gene polymorphism and SSNS risk in children, including seven in Asians, one for Caucasians and two in Africans. There was no markedly positive association between D allele or DD genotype and SSNS susceptibility in Asians, Caucasians and Africans (D: Asians OR = 1.24, p = 0.28; Caucasians OR = 1.61, p = 0.15; Africans OR = 1.61, p = 0.53; DD: Asians OR = 1.72, p = 0.15; Caucasians OR = 1.39, p = 0.48; Africans OR = 1.80, p = 0.56). Furthermore, II homozygous seemed not to play a protective role against SSNS onset for Asians, Caucasians and Africans (Asians OR = 0.95, p = 0.85; Caucasians OR = 0.30, p = 0.11; Africans OR = 0.60, p = 0.65). Conclusions: There was no association between ACE I/D gene polymorphism and SSNS susceptibility in Asians, Caucasians and Africans. However, the conclusions for Caucasians and Africans were less powerful.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available