4.1 Article

Association of echocardiographic left ventricular structure with the ACE D/I polymorphism: a meta-analysis

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1470320310387178

Keywords

ACE; echocardiography; left ventricular geometry; left ventricular mass; meta-analysis

Funding

  1. European Union [IC15-CT98-0329-EPOGH, LSHM-CT-2006-037093 InGenious HyperCare, HEALTH-2007-2.1.1-2 HyperGenes]
  2. Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen, Brussels, Belgium [G.0256.05, G.0575.06]
  3. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium [OT/04/34, OT/05/49]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: In a previous meta-analysis, we derived pooled estimates for the association of left ventricular mass (LVM) and hypertrophy (LVH), as diagnosed by electrocardiography or echocardiography, with the ACE D/I polymorphism. We updated this meta-analysis until May 2009 only considering echocardiographic phenotypes. Methods: We computed pooled estimates from a random-effects model. Results: Across 38 studies, both DD homozygotes (n = 2440) and DI heterozygotes (n = 4310) had higher (p <= 0.002) LVM or LVM index than II homozygotes (n = 2229). Across 21 studies with available data, this was due to increased mean wall thickness (MWT) with no difference in left ventricular internal diameter (LVID). Standardised differences (DD versus II) were 0.39 (p < 0.001) for LVM, 0.34 (p = 0.009) for MWT, and 0.066 (p = 0.26) for LVID. Across 16 studies (4894 participants), the pooled odds ratios of LVH (versus II homozygotes) were 1.11 (p = 0.29) and 1.02 (p = 0.88) for the DD and DI genotypes, respectively. Sensitivity analyses were confirmatory. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis supports the hypothesis that the enhanced ACE activity associated with the D allele is associated with higher LV mass. Smaller sample size might explain the lack of significant association with LVH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available