4.5 Article

Six cases of SCA3/MJD patients that mimic hereditary spastic paraplegia in clinic

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 285, Issue 1-2, Pages 121-124

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2009.06.027

Keywords

Spinocerebellar ataxia type; 3/Machado-Joseph disease; Hereditary spastic paraplegia; MJD1; Spasticity; Ataxia

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30671151, 30470619]
  2. Distinguished Youth Foundations of Hunan Province [2007JJ1005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3/Machado-Joseph disease (SCA3/MJD) is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease characterized by cerebellar ataxia associated with varying phenotypic variability, It was reported that a few of SCA3/MJD patients showed marked spastic paraplegia with or without cerebellar ataxia, which was partially first diagnosed as hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) and considered to be a new subtype (subtype V). But the data in China is still absent. Objective: To investigate the mutation frequency and clinical features of subtype V of SCA3/MJD in Chinese patients with HSP. Methods: Mutation detection of MJD1 gene was carried Out in 46 AD-HSP families and 58 sporadic cases. Results: Expanded CAG repeats that ranged from 64 to 81 of MJD1 gene were found in six probands from 46 AD-HSP families (13%, 6/46). No abnormal repeat expansion was found in sporadic cases (0/58). The initial symptoms of six SCA3 cases were all spasticity in the lower limbs, and nystagmus, dysphagia and dysarthria that occurred with disease progression seemed more frequent than HSP. Conclusion: Subtype V of SCA3/MJD is not rare in China, but it is hard to distinguish between HSP and SCA3/MJD only by clinical manifestation and MRI, and MJD1 gene should be detected routinely in the patients diagnosed as HSP in clinic. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available