4.7 Article

A Peierls perspective on mechanisms of atomic friction

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS
Volume 58, Issue 12, Pages 2023-2032

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2010.09.014

Keywords

Contact mechanics; Dislocation nucleation; Atomic friction; Elastic snap-brick instability; Rice-Peierls framework

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI 0900027]
  2. Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  3. DOE BES
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  5. Directorate For Engineering [0900027] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stick-slip behavior observed from nanoscale asperity friction experiments are often modeled by the one-degree-of freedom Tomlinson model, which is uable to explain the effects of lattice structure and interface defects, or by molecular simulations which suffer temporal limitations in modeling the velocity- and temperature-dependent frictional behavior. A Peierls-type model developed in this work views the atomic frictional process as the initiation and gliding passage of dislocations with diffused cores on the interface. As a consequence of loss-of-ellipticity instability, the occurrence of stick-slip behavior relies on the interaction among interface slip field, contact stress fields, and existing defects. The friction stress for commensurate interface under large contact area can be approximated from the Rice model of screw-dislocation nucleation from a planar crack tip. The spatially inhomogeneous nature of rate-limiting processes and the coupling effects between contact size and interface incommensurability are and the coupling effects between contact size and interface incommensurability are successfully determined, which cannot otherwise be tackled in the Tomlinson model. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available