4.2 Article

Very Late Treatment-Related Alterations in Brain Function of Breast Cancer Survivors

Journal

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1355617714001015

Keywords

Adjuvant chemotherapy; fMRI; long-term; Cognition; Breast cancer; Adverse effects

Funding

  1. AMC Medical Research [09.25.229 I 09.03.270]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) for breast cancer (BC) is associated with very late side-effects on cognition and brain function, studies on adverse effects of specific treatment regimens are scarce. Here, neurotoxicity profiles after different treatment strategies were compared in BC survivors randomized to high-dose (HI) or conventional-dose (CON-) CT, in women treated with radiotherapy (RT) -only and a healthy control (HC) group. We administered a neurocognitive test battery, a planning fMRI task (Tower of London) and episodic memory fMRI task (Paired Associates paradigm) in BC survivors who received CON-CT (n = 24) and HC (n = 27). Data were compared to BC survivors who received HI-CT (n = 17) and RT-only (n = 15) and who were previously assessed. Testing took place +/- 11.5 years post-CT. Furthermore, neurocognitive data were compared to neurocognitive data acquired <= 2 years post-treatment. Cognitive assessment revealed sustained cognitive decline in 10.5% of HI-CT, 8.3% of CON-CT, 6.7% of RT-only patients and 0% in the HC. Hypoactivation was found in task-related prefrontal and parietal areas for both CT-groups versus RT-only, with HI-CT showing more pronounced hypoactivation than CON-CT, combined with worse task performance. RT-only survivors performed at a similar level to HC while showing hyperactivation in task-related brain areas. Long after treatment, CT is associated with cognitive problems and task-related hypoactivation that depend on the specific cytotoxic regimen. This worse performance in patients who received CT could be explained by impaired brain functioning that is more severe with more intense CT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available