4.0 Article

Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Concentration and Source Apportionment in Lahore

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages 1811-1820

Publisher

SOC BRASILEIRA QUIMICA
DOI: 10.1590/S0103-50532009001000007

Keywords

airborne particulate matter; source apportionment; PM2.5; Lahore

Funding

  1. Govt. of Pakistan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The work reported in this paper was carried out to study the trends of PM2.5 (particles with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 mu m or less) concentrations and source apportionment of PM2.5 monitored at an urban residential site in Lahore, Pakistan. PM2.5 aerosol samples were collected for 2 days in a week at 12 h interval in a day, both in dry and wet seasons, on Zefluor (TM) filter papers using Thermo-Electron Corporation Reference Ambient Air Sampler (RAAS). Total 310 samples were collected during the period under study, i.e., from November 2005 to December 2007. High PM2.5 loads were observed in winter, which were approximately 4 times greater than those observed in the summer, spring, fall and monsoon seasons in the yearlong measurements. Source apportionment was performed on short duration analysis results of November 2005 to March 2006 using Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) model. The results derived from PMF model indicated that the major contributors to PM2.5 in Lahore are: soil/road dust, industrial emissions, vehicular emissions and secondary aerosols. It is, therefore, concluded that in addition to local vehicular and industrial emissions, the city is also affected from trans-boundary air pollutants particularly due to secondary aerosols (especially SO42-) during winter which increase PM2.5 concentrations manifold when relatively less mixing height exists. The sulfate particles also facilitate in haze/fog formation during calm highly humid conditions, thus reduce visibility and increase the incidents of respiratory diseases encountered in the city every year.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available