4.4 Article

Droplet Growth in Warm Water Clouds Observed by the A-Train. Part I: Sensitivity Analysis of the MODIS-Derived Cloud Droplet Sizes

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages 1884-1896

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/2009JAS3280.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan [18684025, 19340132]
  2. Advanced Earth Observing Satellite II (ADEOS-II)
  3. Earth Cloud, Aerosol and Radiation Explorer (EarthCARE)
  4. Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA)
  5. National Institute of Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba, Japan
  6. NASA [NNX07AR11G, NAS5-99237]
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18684025, 19340132] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the sensitivity of the retrieved cloud droplet radii (CDR) to the vertical inhomogeneity of droplet radii, including the existence of a drizzle mode in clouds. The focus of this study is warm water-phase clouds. Radiative transfer simulations of three near-infrared Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) channels centered on wavelengths of 1.6, 2.1, and 3.7 mu m reveal that the retrieved CDR are strongly influenced by the vertical inhomogeneity of droplet size including (i) the existence of small cloud droplets at the cloud top and (ii) the existence of the drizzle mode. The influence of smaller droplets at cloud top affects the 3.7-mu m channel most, whereas the presence of drizzle influences radiances of both the 2.1- and 1.6-mu m channels more than the 3.7-mu m channel. Differences in the CDR obtained from MODIS 1.6-, 2.1-, and 3.7-mu m channels that appear in global analysis of MODIS retrievals and the CDR derived from data collected during the First International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) Regional Experiment (FIRE) intensive observation period in 1987 can be explained by the results obtained from the sensitivity experiments of this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available