4.5 Article

Separation of Different Ion Structures in Atmospheric Pressure Photoionization-Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry (APPI-IMS-MS)

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2010.04.018

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [114132, 122018]
  2. Academy of Finland (AKA) [122018, 114132, 122018, 114132] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates how positive ion atmospheric pressure photoionization-ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry (APPI-IMS-MS) can be used to produce different ionic forms of an analyte and how these can be separated. When hexane:toluene (9:1) is used as a solvent, 2,6-di-tert-butylpyridine (2,6-DtBPyr) and 2,6-di-tert-4-methylpyridine (2,6-DtB-4-MPyr) efficiently produce radical cations [M](+) and protonated [M + H](+) molecules, whereas, when the sample solvent is hexane, protonated molecules are mainly formed. Interestingly, radical cations drift slower in the drift tube than the protonated molecules. It was observed that an oxygen adduct ion, [M + O-2](+), which was clearly seen in the mass spectra for hexane:toluene (9:1) solutions, shares the same mobility with radical cations, [M](+). Therefore, the observed mobility order is most likely explained by oxygen adduct formation, i.e., the radical cation forming a heavier adduct. For pyridine and 2-tert-butylpyridine, only protonated molecules could be efficiently formed in the conditions used. For 1- and 2-naphthol it was observed that in hexane the protonated molecule typically had a higher intensity than the radical cation, whereas in hexane:toluene (9:1) the radical cation [M](+-) typically had a higher intensity than the protonated molecule [M + H](+) Interestingly, the latter drifts slower than the radical cation [M](+-), which is the opposite of the drift pattern seen for 2,6-DtBPyr and 2,6-DtB-4-MPyr. (J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2010, 21, 1565-1572) (C) 2010 American Society for Mass Spectrometry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available