4.0 Article Proceedings Paper

Evaluation of community health screening participants' knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION
Volume 49, Issue 4, Pages 529-U86

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.08120

Keywords

Patient education; health screening; risk factors; cardiometabolic risk; questionnaire

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To assess knowledge of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors among a group of health screening participants and to compare knowledge between participants with high and low CVD risk. Design: Cross-sectional pilot study. Setting: Jonesboro, AR, during June 2007. Patients: 121 adult volunteers participating in a community health screening. Intervention: 34-item self-administered written questionnaire. Main outcome measures: Ability to identify CVD risk factors and healthy values for CVD risk factors and the differences in these abilities between participants with high and low CVD risk. Results: Participants demonstrated good knowledge of traditional CVD risk factors such as high blood pressure, high cholesterol, lack of exercise, and overweight or obese status. Knowledge of other CVD risk factors and healthy values for major CVD risk factors was limited. Participants with high CVD risk were significantly more likely to correctly identify high triglycerides as a CVD risk factor and to identify healthy values for fasting blood glucose and total cholesterol compared with participants with low CVD risk. Conclusion: Overall, participants lacked knowledge of the risk factor status and healthy values for many CVD risk factors. Participants with high CVD risk may have better knowledge of some CVD risk factors than participants with low CVD risk. These findings highlight the need for more education to improve knowledge in both risk groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available