4.6 Article

The impact of electronic health records on care of heart failure patients in the emergency room

Journal

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000271

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Department of Health and Human Services [UC1 HS16155]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To evaluate if electronic health records (EHR) have observable effects on care outcomes, we examined quality and efficiency measures for patients presenting to emergency departments (ED). Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective study of 5166 adults with heart failure in three metropolitan EDs. Patients were termed internal if prior information was in the EHR upon ED presentation, otherwise external. Associations of internality with hospitalization, mortality, length of stay (LOS), and numbers of tests, procedures, and medications ordered in the ED were examined after adjusting for age, gender, race, marital status, comorbidities and hospitalization as a proxy for acuity level where appropriate. Results At two EDs internals had lower odds of mortality if hospitalized (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.81 and 0.45; 0.21 to 0.96), fewer laboratory tests during the ED visit (-4.6%; -8.9% to -0.1% and -14.0%; -19.5% to -8.1%) as well as fewer medications (-33.6%; -38.4% to -28.4% and -21.3%; -33.2% to -7.3%). At one of these two EDs, internals had lower odds of hospitalization (0.37; 0.22 to 0.60). At the third ED, internal patients only experienced a prolonged ED LOS (32.3%; 6.3% to 64.8%) but no other differences. There was no association with hospital LOS or number of procedures ordered. Discussion EHR availability was associated with salutary outcomes in two of three ED settings and prolongation of ED LOS at a third, but evidence was mixed and causality remains to be determined. Conclusions An EHR may have the potential to be a valuable adjunct in the care of heart failure patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available