4.6 Article

LexGrid: A Framework for Representing, Storing, and Querying Biomedical Terminologies from Simple to Sublime

Journal

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M3006

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NLM NIH HHS [R01 LM007319] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many biomedical terminologies, classifications, and ontological resources such as the NCI Thesaurus (NCIT), International Classification of Diseases (ICD), Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED), Current Procedural Terminology (CPT), and Gene Ontology (GO) have been developed and Used to build a variety of IT applications in biology, biomedicine, and health care settings. However, virtually all these resources involve incompatible formats, are based oil different Modeling languages, and lack appropriate tooling and programming interfaces (APIs) that hinder their wide-scale adoption and Usage in a variety of application contexts. The Lexical Grid (LexGrid) project introduced in this paper is an ongoing community-driven initiative, coordinated by the Mayo Clinic Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, designed to bridge this gap using a common terminology model called the LexGrid model. The key aspect of the model is to accommodate Multiple vocabulary and Ontology distribution formats and support Of multiple data stores for federated vocabulary distribution. The model provides a foundation for building consistent and standardized APIs to access multiple vocabularies that support lexical search queries, hierarchy, navigation, and a rich set of features such as recursive subsumption (e.g., get all the children of the concept penicillin). Existing LexGrid implementations, include the LexBIG API as well as a reference implementation of the HL7 Common Terminology Services (CTS) specification providing programmatic access via Java, Web, and Grid services. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;6:305-315. DOI 10.1197/jamia.M3006.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available