4.6 Review

Causes and Prevalence of Unplanned Readmissions After Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
Volume 61, Issue 7, Pages 1175-1181

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.12307

Keywords

epidemiology; geriatric; outcomes; rehospitalization

Funding

  1. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
  2. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas
  3. Veterans Integrated Service Network [16]
  4. Veterans Affairs Office of Academic Affiliations
  5. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK081736-01]
  6. Texas Medical Center Digestive Diseases Center [NIH DK58338]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature was conducted to compare the overall and cause-specific readmission rates after colorectal surgery of older adults with those of younger individuals. Potential predictors of unplanned readmission were also identified. Estimated pooled readmission rates were calculated and reported as pooled proportions with associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) in 60,131 total readmissions; 11.0% (95% CI = 10.0-12.0) of all admissions after colorectal surgery resulted in unplanned readmission at 30 days. Older adults had a lower rate of readmission than younger individuals. Bowel obstruction was the most common cause of unplanned readmission, accounting for 33.4% of all unplanned readmissions, followed by surgical site infection (15.7%) and intraabdominal abscess (12.6%). Several age-related predictors of unplanned readmission were identified, such as poor functional capacity, multiple comorbidities, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and discharge to a nonhome destination. The findings of this review will help guide the development of future interventions to reduce preventable readmissions after colorectal surgery in older adults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available