4.5 Article

Predicting Lymph Node Metastases in Early Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Using a Simple Scoring System

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
Volume 217, Issue 2, Pages 191-199

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.03.015

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Quebec Research Fund for Health Sciences (FRSQ)
  2. Postdoc-Programme of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection is an organ-sparing option for early esophageal adenocarcinoma, but should be used only in patients with a negligible risk of lymph node metastases (LNM). The objective was to develop a simple scoring system to predict LNM in T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: All primary esophagectomies performed for T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma without neoadjuvant therapy at 5 university institutions from 2000 to 2011 were analyzed. Patient and pathologic characteristics were compared between patients with LNM at the time of surgical resection and those without. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to establish a simple scoring system that estimated the risk of LNM, using variables from the final surgical pathology. RESULTS: A total of 258 patients were included for analysis (mean age 65.2 years [SD 10.3 years], 88% male). The incidence of LNM was 7% (9 of 122) for T1a and 26% (35 of 136) for T1b. Tumor size (odds ratio [OR] 1.35 per cm, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.71) and lymphovascular invasion (OR 7.50, 95% CI 3.30 to 17.07) were the strongest independent predictors of LNM. A weighted scoring system was devised from the final multivariate model and included size (+1 point per cm), depth of invasion (+2 for T1b), differentiation (+3 for each step of dedifferentiation), and lymphovascular invasion (+6 if present). Total number of points estimated the probability of LNM (low risk [0 to 1 point], <= 2%; moderate risk [2 to 4 points], 3% to 6%; and high risk [5+ points], >= 7%). CONCLUSIONS: We devised a simple scoring system that accurately estimates the risk of LNM to aid in decision-making in patients with T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma undergoing endoscopic resection. (C) 2013 by the American College of Surgeons

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available