4.5 Article

Total Mesorectal Excision with Intraoperative Assessment of Internal Anal Sphincter Innervation Provides New Insights into Neurogenic Incontinence

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
Volume 214, Issue 3, Pages 306-312

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.11.013

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01EZ0722]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to assess internal anal sphincter (IAS) innervation in patients undergoing total mesorectal excision (TME) by intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM). STUDY DESIGN: Fourteen patients underwent TME. IONM was carried out through pelvic splanchnic nerve stimulation under continuous electromyography of the IAS. Anorectal function was assessed with the digital rectal examination scoring system and a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Nine of 11 patients who underwent low anterior resection had positive IONM results, with stimulation-induced increased IAS electromyographic amplitudes (median 0.23 mu V(interquartile range [IQR] 0.05, 0.56) vs median 0.89 mu V (IQR 0.64, 1.88), p < 0.001) after TME. The patients with the positive IONM results were continent after stoma closure. Of 2 patients with negative IONM results, 1 had fecal incontinence after closure of the defunctioning stoma and received a permanent sigmoidostomy. In the other patient the defunctioning stoma was deemed permanent due to decreased anal sphincter function. In 3 patients who underwent abdominoperineal excision, IONM assessed denervation of the IAS after performance of the abdominal part. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that IONM of IAS innervation in rectal cancer patients is feasible and may predict neurogenic fecal incontinence. (J Am Coll Surg 2012;214:306-312. (C) 2012 by the American College of Surgeons)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available