4.5 Article

Primary Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Can Performed Safely in Patients with BMI ≥ 60

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
Volume 208, Issue 2, Pages 236-240

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.020

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND, Several studies suggest patients with a body mass index (BMI; calculated as kg/m(2)) 60 have a greater operative risk and so advocate a staged approach to bariatric procedures. This requires two separate operations and all associated risks. At our institution, we do not perform staged bariatric operations for these patients; we execute a single-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LGBP). Here, we analyze our experience in this population with a single-stage LGBP. STUDY DESIGN: Ninery-five patients with a BMI >= 60 were compared with 1,311 patients with BMI < 60 undergoing LGBP from December 2001 to May 2007. Data recorded included age, BMI, estimated blood loss, operating time, length of stay, and complications within the first 30 days after operation. Analyses, of the data were performed using unpaired Student's t-test, with p < 0.05 as significant. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in age (42.6 versus 42.8 years), estimated blood loss (68.5 versus 69.5 mL), length of stay (3.1 versus 3.1 days), overall complications (12.7% versus 13.7%), or 30-day mortality (0.2% versus 0%) for patients with BMI < 60 as compared with patients with BMI >= 60. The difference in operating time between the 2 groups was statistically significant (111 versus 118.7 minutes; p = 0.02) but likely reflected the learning curve. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, there were no differences in the incidence of complications or mortality for patients with a BMI >= 60 undergoing LGBP as compared with those with a BMI < 60. These high-risk patients can safely undergo a single-stage LGBP. (J Am Coll Surg 2009;208:236-240. (C) 2009 by the American College of Surgeons)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available