4.5 Article

Reoperative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Previous Mastectomy

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
Volume 207, Issue 4, Pages 543-548

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.06.139

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is the standard of care for axillary staging in breast cancer, but many clinical scenarios questioning the validity of SLN biopsy remain. Here we describe our experience with reoperative-SLN (re-SLN) biopsy after previous mastectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Review of the SLN database from September 1996 to December 2007 yielded 20 procedures done in the setting of previous mastectomy. SLN biopsy was performed using radioisotope with or without blue dye injection superior to the mastectomy Incision, In the skin flap in all patients. 111 17 of 20 patients (85%), re-SLN biopsy was performed for local or regional recurrence after mastectomy. RESULTS: Re-SLN biopsy was successful In 13 of 20 patients (65%) after previous mastectomy. Of the 13 patients, 2 had positive re-SLN, and completion axillary dissection was performed, with I having additional positive nodes. In the 11 patients with negative re-SLN, 2 patients underwent completion axillary dissection demonstrating additional negative nodes. One patient with a negative re-SLN experienced chest wall recurrence combined with axillary recurrence I I months after re-SLN biopsy. All others remained free of local or axillary recurrence. Re-SLN biopsy was unsuccessful in 7 of 20 patients (35%). 111 three of seven patients, axillary dissection was performed, yielding positive nodes in two of the three. The remaining four of seven patients all had previous modified radical mastectomy, SO underwent no additional axillary surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In this small series, re-SLN was successful after previous mastectorny, and this procedure may play some role when axillary staging is warranted after mastectorny. (J Am Coll Surg 2008;207: 543-548. (C) 2008 by the American College Of Surgeons)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available