4.8 Article

Unusual Reaction of [NiFe]-Hydrogenases with Cyanide

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 136, Issue 29, Pages 10470-10477

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja504942h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Biological and Biotechnological Sciences Research Council [BB/H003878-1, BB/I022309-1, BB/L009722/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H019480/1]
  3. European Research Council [EnergyBioCatalysis-ERC-2010-StG-258600ERC]
  4. University of Oxford Clarendon Fund Scholarship
  5. Royal Society
  6. BBSRC [BB/I022309/1, BB/L009722/1, BB/H003878/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. EPSRC [EP/H019480/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L009722/1, BB/I022309/1, BB/H003878/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H019480/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cyanide reacts rapidly with [NiFe]-hydrogenases (hydrogenase-1 and hydrogenase-2 from Escherichia coli) under mild oxidizing conditions, inhibiting the electrocatalytic oxidation of hydrogen as recorded by protein film electrochemistry. Electrochemical, EPR, and FTIR measurements show that the final enzyme product, formed within a second (even under 100% H-2), is the resting state known as Ni-B, which contains a hydroxido-bridged species, Ni-III-mu(OH)-Fe-II, at the active site. Cyanide inhibition is easily reversed because it is simply the reductive activation of Ni-B. This paper brings back into focus an observation originally made in the 1940s that cyanide inhibits microbial H-2 oxidation and addresses the interesting mechanism by which cyanide promotes the formation of Ni-B. As a much stronger nucleophile than hydroxide, cyanide binds more rapidly and promotes oxidation of Ni-II to Ni-III; however, it is quickly replaced by hydroxide which is a far superior bridging ligand.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available