4.8 Article

Theoretical Characterization of Four Distinct Isomer Types in Hydrated-Electron Clusters, and Proposed Assignments for Photoelectron Spectra of Water Cluster Anions

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 133, Issue 49, Pages 19889-19899

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja208024p

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-0748448]
  2. Ohio State University
  3. Division Of Chemistry
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0748448] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Water cluster anions, (H2O)(N)(-), are examined using mixed quantum/classical molecular dynamics based on a one-electron pseudopotential model that incorporates many-body polarization and predicts vertical electron detachment energies (VDEs) with an accuracy of similar to 0.1 eV. By varying the initial conditions under which the clusters are formed, we are able to identify four distinct isomer types that exhibit different size-dependent VDEs. On the basis of a strong correlation between the electron's radius of gyration and its optical absorption maximum, and extrapolating to the bulk limit (N -> infinity), our analysis supports the assignment of the isomer Ib data series, observed in photoelectron spectra of very cold clusters, as arising from cavity-bound ((H2O)(N)(-), cluster isomers. The isomer I data reported in warmer experiments are assigned to surface-bound isomers in smaller clusters, transitioning to partially embedded isomers in larger clusters. The partially embedded isomers are characterized by a partially formed solvent cavity at the cluster surface, and they are spectroscopically quite similar to internalized cavity isomers. These assignments are consistent with various experimental data, and our theoretical characterization of these isomers sheds new light on a long-standing assignment problem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available