4.8 Article

Finite Size Effect of Proton-Conductivity of Amorphous Silicate Thin Films Based on Mesoscopic Fluctuation of Glass Network

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 133, Issue 10, Pages 3471-3479

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja1091886

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JSPS
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [B01]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23246112] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The finite size effect of proton conductivity of amorphous silicate thin films, a-M0.1Si0.9Ox (M = Al, Ga, Hf, Ti, Ta, and La), was investigated. The proton conductivity across films, sigma, was measured in dry air by changing the thickness in the range of 10-1000 nm. sigma of the films with M = Al, Ga, and Ta was elevated in a power law by decreasing thickness into less than a few hundred nanometers, and the increment was saturated at a thickness of several 10's of nanometers. On the other hand, a of the films with M = Hf, Ti, and La was not related to the decrease of the thickness in the range of >10 nm. Thickness-dependent conductivity of the former could be numerically simulated by a percolative resistor network model that involves the randomly distributed 3 4 5 6 7 8 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 array of two kinds of resistors R-1 and R-2 (R-1 > R-2) in the form of a simple cubic-type lattice. High-resolution TEM clarified that a-M0.1Si0.9Ox films involved heterogeneous microstructures made of the condensed domain and the surrounding uncondensed matrix due to the fluctuation of glass networks on the nanometer scale. The condensed domain had a wormlike shape with an average length of several 10's of nanometers and performed the role of the proton conduction pathway penetrating through the poorly conducting matrix. It was concluded that the thickness-dependent conductivity could be identical to finite-size scaling of the percolative network of the interconnected domains in the nanometer range.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available