4.8 Article

Molecular Details from Computational Reaction Dynamics for the Cellobiohydrolase I Glycosylation Reaction

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 133, Issue 48, Pages 19474-19482

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja206842j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. South African Research Chairs Initiative (SARChI) of the Department of Science and Technology
  2. National Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glycosylation of cellobiose hydrolase I (CBHI), is a key step in the processing and degradation of cellulose. Here the pathways and barriers of the reaction are explored using the free energy from adaptive reaction coordinate forces (FEARCF) reaction dynamics method coupled with SCC-DFTB/MM. In many respects CBHI follows the expected general GH7 family mechanism that involves the Glu-X-Asp-X-X-Glu motif. However, critical electronic and conformational details, previously not known, were discovered through our computations. The central feature that ensures the success of the glycosylation reaction are the Glu212 nucleophile's hydrogen bond to the hydroxyl on C2, of the glucose in the -1 position of the cellulosic strand. This Glu212 function restricts the C2 hydroxyl in such a way as to favor the formation of the E-4 ring pucker of the -1 position glucose. A frontier molecular orbital analysis of the structures along the reaction surface proves the existence of an oxocarbenium ion, which has both transition state and intermediate character. The transition state structure is able to descend down the glycosylation pathway through the critical combination of Asp214 (HOMO), ring oxygen (LUMO), and Glu212 (HOMO), anomeric carbon (LUMO) interactions. Using the fully converged FEARCF SCC-DFTB/MM reaction surface, we find a barrier of 17.48 kcal/mol separating bound cellulose chain from the glycosylated CBHI. Taking recrossing into account gives k(cat) = 0.415 s(-1) for cellobiohydrolase glycosylation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available