4.5 Article

Lower expression of tumor microRNA-26a is associated with higher recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing surgical treatment

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 118, Issue 3, Pages 431-439

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.25156

Keywords

biomarker; cirrhosis; hepatocellular carcinoma; liver diseases; microRNA-26

Funding

  1. Showalter Trust Foundation
  2. American Cancer Society Institutional Research Grant (ASCIRG grant mechanism)
  3. IU Simon Cancer Center
  4. American Cancer Society Research Scholar Grant [RSG-18-105-01-RMC]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and ObjectivesHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) exhibit lower tumor microRNA-26a (miR-26a) expression which is associated with worse outcomes. It is unknown if similar miR-26a loss occurs inHCC developed in other liver diseases. We examined tumor miR-26a expression and its impact on recurrence and mortality in a North American HCC cohort. MethodsMiR-26a levels from tumor and surrounding nontumor liver tissue in 186 subjects were collected. We defined lower tumor expression of miR-26a as <1-fold that of the adjacent nontumor liver tissue. ResultsViral hepatitis (42%; 40% hepatitis C and 2% HBV), alcohol (19%), and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (18%) were the most common causes of liver disease. The prevalence of lower tumor miR-26a expression was 68%, and it was evident in HCCs arising in all etiologies (viral hepatitis 60%, alcohol 61%, and NAFLD 76%). Subjects with lower tumor miR-26a expression had significantly higher tumor recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 2.45; 95% confidence interval[CI], 1.18 to 5.1; P=0.016) and higher mortality of borderline significance (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.94 to 2.41; P=0.086). ConclusionReduced miR-26a expression is a common phenomenon in HCC arising in North American patients with different underlying liver diseases and may increase recurrence and mortality after surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available