4.5 Article

The Influence of Dispositional Optimism on Decision Regret to Undergo Major Breast Reconstructive Surgery

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 108, Issue 8, Pages 526-530

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jso.23437

Keywords

autologous abdominal tissue; reconstructive microsurgery; outcomes; ethnicity; psychosocial; decision-making

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & ObjectivesIt is not known if optimism influences regret following major reconstructive breast surgery. We examined the relationship between dispositional optimism, major complications and decision regret in patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction. MethodsA consecutive series of 290 patients were surveyed. Independent variables were: (1) dispositional optimism and (2) major complications. The primary outcome was Decision Regret. A multivariate regression analysis determined the relationship between the independent variables, confounders and decision regret. ResultsOf the 181 respondents, 63% reported no regret after breast reconstruction, 26% had mild regret, and 11% moderate to severe regret. Major complications did not have a significant effect on decision regret, and the impact of dispositional optimism was not significant in Caucasian women. There was a significant effect in non-Caucasian women with less optimism who had significantly higher levels of mild regret 1.36 (CI 1.02-1.97) and moderate to severe regret 1.64 (CI 1.0-93.87). ConclusionsThis is the first paper to identify a subgroup of non-Caucasian patients with low dispositional optimism who may be at risk for developing regret after microsurgical breast reconstruction. Possible strategies to ameliorate regret may involve addressing cultural and language barriers, setting realistic expectations, and providing more supports during the pre-operative decision-making phase. J. Surg. Oncol. 2013; 108:526-530. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available