4.5 Review

Methods of Esophagogastric Anastomoses Following Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Systematic Review

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 101, Issue 6, Pages 527-533

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.21510

Keywords

systematic review; esophageal cancer; anastomosis; surgical technique

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anastomotic complications are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy for cancer. Conflicting reports exist regarding the superiority of hand-sewn versus stapled techniques. This systematic review identified eight randomized clinical trials examining this issue. None of the studies reported significant differences in leak rate or early mortality. One study demonstrated a difference in stricture rates, with fewer for hand-sewn anastomoses. There is insufficient evidence to recommend one anastomotic technique over the other. J. Surg. Oncol. 2010:101:527-533. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available