4.5 Article

Symptomatic and Quality of Life Changes After Extrapleural Pneumonectomy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 100, Issue 3, Pages 199-204

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.21261

Keywords

malignant pleural mesothelioma; quality of life; extrapleural pneumonectomy; thoracic surgery

Funding

  1. Tor Vergata University
  2. Italian Health Ministry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Extrapletiral pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma is considered in aggressive procedure, but symptomatic and quality of life changes are unknown. Methods: Between 1997 and 2004, 16 consecutive patients underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy for mesothelioma followed by chemoradiotherapy. Tumor-related symptoms and quality of life (Short-Form-36 and St. George's questionnaires) were assessed pre, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Results: Thirty-day postoperative major morbidity was 31% with no mortality. At 3 months postoperatively, dyspnea improved in 10 patients (62%), pain in 12 (75%), cough in 10 (62%), fever in 11 (68%), Karnofsky-index in 10 (62%), Short-Form-36 physical-component-summary in 8. mental-component-summary in 5 and total St. George score in 8 (50%). At 1 year 10 (62%) patients were alive and majority of improved parameters were still stable. Thereafter they usually started to decline. Survival was influenced by nonepithelial histology (P < 0.01) and N2-disease (P < 0.01), which showed to be the only prognosticator at Cox regression (P < 0.0001. Odd ratio 5.4). Among symptomatic variables, a 3-month postoperative Short-Form-36 physical-component-summary above the median value correlated significantly with a better prognosis (P < 0.02). Conclusions: Extrapletiral pneumonectomy may rapidly improve symptoms as well as quality of life, especially in physical domains. Other than biological factors, postoperative Short-Form-36 physical component as well, significantly influenced the prognosis. J. Surg. Oncol. 2009;100:199-204. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available