4.5 Review

The Role of Guidelines in Quality Improvement for Cancer Surgery

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages 467-469

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/jso.21171

Keywords

phrases; quality improvement; guidelines; cancer surgery; outcomes

Funding

  1. Cancer Surgery Alberta, Alberta Cancer Board
  2. Program in Evidence-based Care
  3. Cancer Care Ontario
  4. Canadian Partnership Against Cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In February 2008, Cancer Surgery Alberta hosted a conference on surgical outcomes and quality. The objective here is to review the interactions between quality/outcomes and guidelines, highlighting surgeons' roles. Potential interactions between quality measurement and guidelines are discussed. We analyzed data from practitioner surveys about guidelines to determine surgeons' participation compared with other specialists. The response rate of surgeons in both community-based and academic practices to guideline development surveys was equivalent to other cancer disciplines. J. Surg. Oncol. 2009:99:467-469. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available