4.5 Article

Reconciliation of contrasting theories for fracture spacing in layered rocks

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 551-565

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2011.01.008

Keywords

Fracture spacing; Rock joints; Shear lag model; Distinct element method

Funding

  1. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [07/RFP/GEOF340, 08/RFP/GEO1170]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [07/RFP/GEOF340, 08/RFP/GEO1170] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Natural and man-made brittle layers embedded in a weaker matrix and subjected to layer-parallel extension typically develop an array of opening-mode fractures with a remarkably regular spacing. This spacing often scales with layer thickness, and it decreases as extension increases until fracture saturation is reached. Existing analytical one-dimensional (1-D) 'full-slip' models, which assume that interfacial slip occurs over the entire length of the fracture-bound blocks, predict that the ratio of fracture spacing to layer thickness at saturation is proportional to the ratio of layer tensile to interface shear strength (T/tau). Using 2-D discontinuum mechanical models run for conditions appropriate to layered rocks, we show that fracture spacing at saturation decreases linearly with decreasing T/tau ratio, as predicted by 1-D models. At low T/tau ratios (ca. <3.0), however, interfacial slip is suppressed and the heterogeneous 2-D stress distribution within fracture-bound blocks controls further fracture nucleation, as predicted by an existing 2-D 'fracture infill criterion'. The applicability of the two theories is hence T/tau ratio dependent. Our models illustrate that fracture spacing in systems permitting interfacial slip is not necessarily an indicator of fracture system maturity. Fracture spacing is expected to decrease with increasing overburden pressure and decreasing layer tensile strength. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available