4.4 Article

EFFECTS OF LIFTING TEMPO ON ONE REPETITION MAXIMUM AND HORMONAL RESPONSES TO A BENCH PRESS PROTOCOL

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 406-413

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bf053b

Keywords

cadence; endocrine; metabolic; plasma volume change; 1RM

Categories

Funding

  1. Springfield College
  2. School of Health, Physical Education and Recreation at Springfield College

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Headley, SA, Henry, K, Nindl, BC, Thompson, BA, Kraemer, WJ, and Jones, MT. Effects of lifting tempo on one repetition maximum and hormonal responses to a bench press protocol. J Strength Cond Res 25(2): 406-413, 2011-This study was carried out in 2 parts: part 1 was designed to measure the 1 repetition maximum (1RM) bench press with 2 different moderate-velocity tempos (2/0/2) vs. (2/0/4) in male lifters while part 2 compared the hormonal responses at the same tempos as described in part 1. In both parts 1 and 2, the 1RMs (lbs) were higher on the 2/0/2 tempo than on the 2/0/4 tempo. The change in plasma volume (PV) was greater after the 2/0/4 tempo (-5.7 +/- 1.7% vs. 0.96 +/- 1.2%, p < 0.05). All blood parameters were significantly (p < 0.05) higher post-exercise compared with baseline. With PV corrected, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) (ng.mL(-1)) was higher with the 2/0/2 tempo only (pre-exercise: 277.4 +/- 21.8, post-exercise: 308.1 +/- 22.9; 2/0/4 tempo pre-exercise: 277.2 +/- 17.6, post-exercise: 284.8 +/- 21.2). In conclusion, heavier loads can be lifted and more total work can be performed using a (2/0/2) tempo compared with a slower (2/0/4) tempo, but with the exception of IGF-1, the hormonal responses are similar. Individuals may get the same metabolic responses to training by using different tempos, but they will need to use less weight at a slower tempo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available