4.4 Article

EFFECTS OF 21 DAYS OF INTENSIFIED TRAINING ON MARKERS OF OVERTRAINING

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages 2604-2612

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e8a4eb

Keywords

overreaching; cycling; functional overreaching; nonfunctional overreaching; overtraining syndrome

Categories

Funding

  1. Air Force Research Laboratory [FA5650-06-2-6740]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Slivka, DR, Hailes, WS, Cuddy, JS, and Ruby, BC. Effects of 21 days of intensified training on markers of overtraining. J Strength Cond Res 24(10): 2604-2612, 2010-The purpose of this study was to impose a period of quantifiable intensified training to determine if commonly used diagnostic markers of overtraining parallel changes in physical performance and thus overtraining status. Eight trained male cyclists (24 +/- 1 years, 71 +/- 3 kg, (V) over dotO(2)peak = 4.5 +/- 0.1.L.min(-1)) performed 21 days (3,211 km) of intensified training in the field where volume and intensity were increased over normal training. Salivary IgA, testosterone, and cortisol, 1-hour time trial performance, heart rate response, and profile of mood states (POMS) were collected and analyzed throughout the 21-day training period. The POMS category vigor declined from day 1 to day 4 and remained lower throughout (p < 0.05). There were no other statistical changes in overtraining parameters. However, individuals who demonstrated 2 or more symptoms of overtraining at any point throughout the 21 days were considered symptomatic and had a lower (p < 0.05) (V) over dotO(2)peak (4.2 +/- 0.1.vs. 4.7 +/- 0.1 L.min(-1)) and lower (p < 0.05) average workload during the initial 1-hour time trial (253 +/- 5 vs. 288 +/- 14 W). Interestingly, the 1-hour time trial power in these individuals with symptoms of overtraining did not decline (p > 0.05). These data demonstrate that markers of overtraining do not parallel a decrease in performance and should be interpreted with caution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available