4.6 Article

Rapid weight-loss impairs simulated riding performance and strength in jockeys: implications for making-weight

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 383-391

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2013.825732

Keywords

jockey; horse racing; dehydration; performance; reaction time; strength

Categories

Funding

  1. Hallowed Turf partnership

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the performance concerns of dehydration in other sports, there are currently no data on the effects of rapid weight-loss on the physical and cognitive performance of jockeys in a sport-specific context. In a randomised crossover design, eight Great Britain (GB) male licensed jockeys were assessed for chest strength, leg strength, simulated riding performance (assessed by maximum pushing frequency on a mechanical riding simulator during the final two furlongs of a simulated 2 mile race) and simple reaction time after performing 45min of exercise, during which euhydration was maintained (Control trial) or induced 2% dehydration (Rapid Weight-Loss trial). Reductions in both chest (-13.8 +/- 3.03% vs. 0.62 +/- 1.04%) and leg strength (-4.8 +/- 4.8% vs. -0.56 +/- 2.5%) were greater in Rapid Weight-Loss compared with Control (P<0.01 and P=0.04, respectively). Similarly, reductions in simulated riding performance were also greater (P=0.05) in Rapid Weight-Loss (-2.8 +/- 4.0%) compared with Control (-0.07 +/- 1.5%), whereas there were no significant changes (P=0.14) in simple reaction time. We conclude that a 2% reduction in body mass, as achieved by 45min of moderate-intensity exercise undertaken in a sweatsuit (a common method of inducing acute dehydration by jockeys), significantly impairs maximum pushing frequency during a simulated race. In addition, the observed reductions in strength may also increase the occupational hazards associated with race riding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available