4.0 Article

Lower extremity functional electrical stimulation cycling promotes physical and functional recovery in chronic spinal cord injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages 623-631

Publisher

MANEY PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000101

Keywords

Spinal cord injury; Activity-based restorative therapy; Functional electrical stimulation; Rehabilitation; Cycle ergometry; Assistive technology; Paraplegia; Tetraplegia; Rehabilitation; Physical muscle strength; Spasticity; Quality of life

Funding

  1. Deans Fund at Washington University School of Medicine
  2. Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation
  3. Barnes-Jewish Hospital Auxiliary Foundation
  4. Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation (C.S.)
  5. Nextsteps Foundation (St. Louis, MO)
  6. Sam Schmidt Foundation (Las Vegas, NV
  7. C.S.)
  8. Gateway to a Cure Foundation (St. Louis, MO)
  9. Eric Westacott Foundation (St. Louis, MO)
  10. Intramural Research Program at the NIH Clinical Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine the effect of long-termlower extremity functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling on the physical integrity and functional recovery in people with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Retrospective cohort, mean follow-up 29.1 months, and cross-sectional evaluation. Setting: Washington University Spinal Cord Injury Neurorehabilitation Center, referral center. Participants: Twenty-five people with chronic SCI who received FES during cycling were matched by age, gender, injury level, and severity, and duration of injury to 20 people with SCI who received range of motion and stretching. Intervention: Lower extremity FES during cycling as part of an activity-based restorative treatment regimen. Main outcome measure: Change in neurological function: motor, sensory, and combined motor-sensory scores (CMSS) assessed by the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment scale. Response was defined as >= 1 point improvement. Results: FES was associated with an 80% CMSS responder rate compared to 40% in controls. An average 9.6 CMSS point loss among controls was offset by an average 20-point gain among FES subjects. Quadriceps muscle mass was on average 36% higher and intra/inter-muscular fat 44% lower, in the FES group. Hamstring and quadriceps muscle strength was 30 and 35% greater, respectively, in the FES group. Quality of life and daily function measures were significantly higher in FES group. Conclusion: FES during cycling in chronic SCI may provide substantial physical integrity benefits, including enhanced neurological and functional performance, increased muscle size and force-generation potential, reduced spasticity, and improved quality of life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available