4.0 Article

Trajectories of musculoskeletal shoulder pain after spinal cord injury: Identification and predictors

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 288-298

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000168

Keywords

Longitudinal studies; Prospective studies; Shoulder; Spinal cord injuries; Upper extremity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective/Background: Although shoulder pain is a problem in up to 86% of persons with a spinal cord injury (SCI), so far, no studies have empirically identified longitudinal patterns (trajectories) of musculoskeletal shoulder pain after SCI. The objective of this study was: (1) to identify distinct trajectories of musculoskeletal shoulder pain in persons with SCI, and (2) to determine possible predictors of these trajectories. Design/Methods: Multicenter, prospective cohort study in 225 newly injured persons with SCI. Outcome Measure: Shoulder pain was assessed on five occasions up to 5 years after discharge. Latent class growth mixture modeling was used to identify the distinct shoulder pain trajectories. Results: Three distinct shoulder pain trajectories were identified: (1) a No or Low pain trajectory (64%), (2) a High pain (30%) trajectory, and (3) a trajectory with a Decrease of pain (6%). Compared with the No or Low pain pain trajectory, the High pain trajectory consisted of more persons with tetraplegia, shoulder pain before injury, limited shoulder range of motion (ROM), lower manual muscle test scores, or more spasticity at t(1). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed two significant predictors for the High pain trajectory (as compared with the No or Low pain trajectory): having a tetraplegia (odds ratio (OR) = 3.2; P = 0.002) and having limited shoulder ROM (OR = 2.8; P = 0.007). Conclusion: Shoulder pain in people with SCI follows distinct trajectories. At risk for belonging to the High pain trajectory are persons with tetraplegia and those with a limited shoulder ROM at start of active rehabilitation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available