4.0 Article

Flexion Model Simulating Spinal Cord Injury Without Radiographic Abnormality in Patients With Ossification of the Longitudinal Ligament: The Influence of Flexion Speed on the Cervical Spine

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages 555-559

Publisher

AMER PARAPLEGIA SOC
DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2009.11754557

Keywords

Spinal cord injuries; Cervical spine; Myelopathy; Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; Finite element method; Biomechanics; SCIWORA (Spinal Cord Injury Without Radiographic Abnormality)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Objective: It is suspected that the speed of the motion of the spinal cord under static compression may be the cause of spinal cord injury (SCI). However, little is known about the relationship between the speed of the motion of the spinal cord and its stress distributions. The objective was to carry out a biomechanical study of SCI in patients with ossification of the longitudinal ligament without radiologic evidence of injury. Methods: A 3-dimensional finite element spinal cord model was established. After the application of static compression, the model underwent anterior flexion to simulate SCI in ossification of the longitudinal ligament patients without radiologic abnormality. Flexion of the spine was assumed to occur at I motor segment. Flexion angle was 5 degrees, and flexion speeds were 0.5 degrees/s, 5 degrees/s, and 50 degrees/s. Stress distributions inside of the spinal cord were evaluated. Results: Stresses on the spinal cord increased slightly after the application of 5 degrees of flexion at a speed of 0.5 degrees/s. Stresses became much higher at a speed of 5 degrees/s and increased further at 50 degrees s. Conclusions: The stress distribution of the spinal cord under static compression increased with faster flexion speed of the spinal cord. High-speed motion of the spinal cord under static compression may be one of the causes of SCI in the absence of radiologic abnormality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available