4.1 Article

Correlation of marine beds based on Sr- and Ar-date determinations and faunal affinities across the Paleogene/Neogene boundary in southern Patagonia, Argentina

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOUTH AMERICAN EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 204-216

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2008.03.006

Keywords

Isotopic ages; Paleogeography; Paleogene/Neogene; Patagonia

Funding

  1. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales
  2. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa
  3. CONICET, Argentina
  4. NSF [OPP 9417697, OPP 9909184]
  5. Karen Bice

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The San Julian and Monte Leon formations (Patagonian) are exposed along the Atlantic coast of Patagonia, whereas in the west equivalent rocks are known as Centinela Formation. Sixteen Sr-87/Sr-86 measurements on the oyster Crassostrea? hatcheri (Ortmann) from the San Julian and Centinela formations and an 40Ar/39Ar-date from a whole-rock sample from the Centinela Formation yielded ages that allow more precise correlation between the two area S. Sr-87/Sr-86 measurements from the San Julian Formation yielded ages between 23.83 and 25.93 Ma, while for the Centinela Formation the ages ranged between 21.24 and 26.38 Ma. The 40Ar/39Ar analysis of a sample of the Centinela Formation yielded an age of 20.48 +/- 0.27 Ma. The age data suggest a late Oligocene (Chattian) age for the San Julian Formation and the lowermost beds of the Centinela Formation (northernmost exposures). The Monte Leon Formation along the East coast and the entire section of the Centinela Formation in the southern area - and the middle and upper beds of this same unit in the northernmost localities - were deposited at the end of the Oligocene and early Miocene (Chattian-Burdigalian). The invertebrate fauna present in these units shows diverse preservation patterns that makes these fossils, especially the mollusks, not useful - at this stage for correlation purposes. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available