4.1 Article

Study of Micellar Behavior of SDS and CTAB in Aqueous Media Containing Furosemide-A Cardiovascular Drug

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOLUTION CHEMISTRY
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages 622-638

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10953-010-9534-9

Keywords

Furosemide; Sodium dodecyl sulfate; Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide; Critical micellization concentration (CMC); Aqueous solutions

Funding

  1. University Grant Commission, New Delhi [32-237/2006(SR), F142(SC)/2007(SA-III)]
  2. Rajiv Gandhi National Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sound velocity and density measurements of aqueous solutions of the anionic surfactant SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) and the cationic surfactant CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) with the drug furosemide (0.002 and 0.02 mol.dm(-3)) have been carried out in the temperature range 20-40 degrees C. From these measurements, the compressibility coefficient (beta), apparent molar volume (phi(v)) and apparent molar compressibility (phi(k)) have been computed. From electrical conductivity measurements, the critical micelle concentrations (CMCs) of SDS and CTAB has been determined in the above aqueous furosemide solutions. From the CMC values as a function of temperature, various thermodynamic parameters have been evaluated: the standard enthalpy change (Delta H-m(o)),standard entropy change (Delta S-m(o)), and standard Gibbs energy change (Delta G(m)(o)) for micellization. This work also included viscosity studies of aqueous solutions of SDS and CTAB with the drug in order to determine the relative viscosity (eta(r)). UV-Vis studies have also been carried for the ternary drug/surfactant/water system having SDS in the concentration range 0.002-0.014 mol.dm(-3). All of these parameters are discussed in terms of drug-drug, drug-solvent and drug-surfactant interactions resulting from of various electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available