4.6 Article

Microporous metal organic framework [M2(hfipbb)2(ted)] (M=Zn, Co; H2hfipbb=4,4-(hexafluoroisopropylidene)-bis(benzoic acid); ted=triethylenediamine): Synthesis, structure analysis, pore characterization, small gas adsorption and CO2/N2 separation properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE CHEMISTRY
Volume 200, Issue -, Pages 1-6

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2012.12.030

Keywords

Metal organic framework; Small gas adsorption; CO2 capture and separation; Ideal adsorbed solution theory; Isosteric heat of adsorption; Microporosity

Funding

  1. Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering [DE-FG02-08ER46491]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas that is a major contributor to global warming. Developing methods that can effectively capture CO2 is the key to reduce its emission to the atmosphere. Recent research shows that microporous metal organic frameworks (MOFs) are emerging as a promising family of adsorbents that may be promising for use in adsorption based capture and separation of CO2 from power plant waste gases. In this work we report the synthesis, crystal structure analysis and pore characterization of two microporous MOF structures, [M-2(hfipbb)(2)(ted)] (M=Zn (1), Co (2); H(2)hflpbb=4,4-(hexafluoroisopropylidene)-bis(benzoic acid); ted=triethylenediamine). The CO2 and N-2 adsorption experiments and IAST calculations are carried out on [Zn-2(hflpbb)(2)(ted)] under conditions that mimic post-combustion flue gas mixtures emitted from power plants. The results show that the framework interacts with CO2 strongly, giving rise to relatively high isosteric heats of adsorption (up to 28 kJ/mol), and high adsorption selectivity for CO2 over N-2, making it promising for capturing and separating CO2 from CO2/N-2 mixtures. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available