4.5 Article

Highly efficient in vitro tetraploid plant production via colchicine treatment using embryogenic suspension cultures in grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv. Mencia)

Journal

PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE
Volume 123, Issue 3, Pages 547-555

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-015-0859-3

Keywords

Colchicine; Embryogenic cell suspension culture; Flow cytometry; Somatic embryogenesis; Tetraploid; Winegrape

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity [AGL2009-07488]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation through MAEC-AECID scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In vitro chromosome doubling techniques have been used to produce polyploids in several species, including table grapes, but limited research in this field has been performed using winegrapes. An efficient procedure was established to induce tetraploid grapevine plants by colchicine treatment of embryogenic cell aggregates (ECAs) grown in winegrape cultivar (cv. Mencia) suspension cultures. Colchicine treatment caused a significant decrease in the survival and embryogenic potential of the ECAs compared with the control. However, plantlets were regenerated and assessed for ploidy level by flow cytometry. Almost all plants not treated with colchicine maintained their ploidy level, whereas colchicine treatment resulted in a high variation in ploidy level. Colchicine at 0.2 % was the most effective concentration for obtaining tetraploid plantlets (25 % tetraploids). No chimeric or mixoploid plantlets were detected in this study. Based on the unique cell origin of grapevine somatic embryos, our system prevented obtaining chimeric plants. This protocol allows an increase in grapevine genetic diversity and could be a valuable tool for improving this crop. To our knowledge, this is the first report on in vitro chromosome doubling by colchicine treatment of embryogenic cell aggregates growing in grapevine suspension cultures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available