4.3 Article

Impingement syndrome: Temporal outcomes of nonoperative treatment

Journal

JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 172-177

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.09.005

Keywords

Impingement syndrome; physical therapy; injections; surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypothesis: We prospectively studied patients with impingement syndrome to look at outcomes of nonoperative treatment on a temporal basis. Materials and methods: Temporal outcomes of 100 consecutive patients treated for impingement syndrome were prospectively evaluated. All patients began a standardized, nonoperative treatment protocol consisting of a subacromial steroid injection, followed by physical therapy. Results: Data were available on 94 patients at the final two-year follow-up assessment. Overall, 74 of 94 patients did not require surgery. In that group, the average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) outcome score increased from 56 to 95, with an average decrease in the pain score from 4.8 to 0.6. Improvement was demonstrated in patient shoulder outcome scores (ASES score) and visual analog pain scores between treatment initiation and the one-year follow-up assessment (p < .0001); no improvement was identified past one year. Of the non-surgical patients, 22 continued to have some shoulder pain. Conclusion: Of patients with impingement syndrome treated nonoperatively, 79% did not require surgery after two-year follow-up. Predictors of patients going on to surgical intervention included the total number of subacromial steroid/lidocaine injections and patient response to the initial subacromial injection. Of the patients not undergoing surgery, 30% continued to have some shoulder pain. Level of evidence: Level 1; Prospective prognosis study, > 80% follow-up. (c) 2009 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available