4.3 Article

Urogenital Complaints and Female Sexual Dysfunction (Part 1) (CME)

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages 1704-1713

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01769.x

Keywords

Sexual Dysfunction; Dyspareunia; Interstitial Cystitis; Urinary Incontinence; Pelvic Floor Dysfunction; Overactive Bladder

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction. Sexual dysfunction and dyspareunia are common complaints in women with urological disorders. Aim. To provide a comprehensive review of sexual dysfunction related to common hypersensitive/hyperactive urogenital disorders including interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome (IC/PBS), overactive bladder (OAB) with and without incontinence, and high-tone pelvic floor muscle dysfunction and the appropriate treatment strategies. Methods. A medical literature search using several related terms including sexual dysfunction, dyspareunia, IC/PBS, OAB, urinary incontinence pelvic floor dysfunction, and levator ani muscle spasm. Main Outcome Measures. Review of the medical literature to identify relation between sexual dysfunction and common urological disorders in women and to describe appropriate treatment strategies to improve the women's quality of life. Results. A thorough review of sexual dysfunction in urological disorders and their related treatments modalities including: behavioral, pharmacological, and nonpharmacological therapies. Conclusions. Sexual dysfunction is a common, underestimated, and untreated complaint in women with urologic disorders. Identifying sexual complaints and treating the underlying etiologies can result in significant improvement in a woman's quality of life. This process requires a focused, multidisciplinary approach tailored to meet the needs of women with urogenital complaints. Wehbe SA, Whitmore K, and Kellogg-Spadt S. Urogenital complaints and female sexual dysfunction (part 1). J Sex Med 2010;7:1704-1713.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available