4.5 Article

Determination of the polyphenolic content of a Capsicum annuum L. extract by liquid chromatography coupled to photodiode array and mass spectrometry detection and evaluation of its biological activity

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 171-178

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201400993

Keywords

Antimicrobial activity; Antioxidant activity; Capsicum annuum L.; Liquid chromatography; Polyphenols

Funding

  1. European Union
  2. project Enhancement of R&D Pools of Excellence at the University of Pardubice [CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study was aimed to investigate the polyphenolic profile of a pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) extract from Algeria and evaluate its biological activity. The total polyphenol content of the extract was determined as 1.373 mg of gallic acid equivalents (+/- 0.0046), whereas the flavonoids were determined as 0.098 mg of quercetin (+/- 0.0015). The determination of the complete polyphenolic profile of the extract was achieved by liquid chromatography with an RP-amide column in combination with photodiode array and mass spectrometry detection through an electrospray ionization interface. A total of 18 compounds were identified, of which five were reported for the first time in the sample tested. Quercetin rhamnoside was the most abundant compound (82.6 mu g/g of fresh pepper) followed by quercetin glucoside (19.86 mu g/g). The antioxidant activity and antimicrobial effects were also determined. For the antimicrobial tests assessed against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, kaempferol showed the strongest inhibitory effect followed by quercetin and caffeic acids. In the study of the cytotoxicity of the extract, the cancer cells (U937) were more affected than the normal cells (peripheral blood mononucleated cells), with more than 62% inhibition at the highest concentration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available